Understanding Risk Profiles: From Conservative to Aggressive
A Guide to Different Risk Levels
Risk assessment questionnaires in investment management typically evaluate five key areas: investment knowledge, risk comfort, risk perception, market understanding, and risk-return philosophy. Using a scale where responses range from "strongly agree" (1 point) to "strongly disagree" (4 points), these assessments generate total scores between 5 and 20 points.
When you are answering these questions, think about times when you have made money and lost money. How did that make you feel?
Example Questionnaire:
Investing is too difficult to understand
Strongly agree
Tend to agree
Tend to disagree
Strongly disagree
I am more comfortable putting my money in a bank account than in the stock market.
Strongly agree
Tend to agree
Tend to disagree
Strongly disagree
When I think of the word “risk,” the term “loss” comes to mind immediately.
Strongly agree
Tend to agree
Tend to disagree
Strongly disagree
Making money in stocks and bonds is based on luck.
Strongly agree
Tend to agree
Tend to disagree
Strongly disagree
In terms of investing, safety is more important than returns.
Strongly agree
Tend to agree
Tend to disagree
Strongly disagree
Industry research has observed that total score ranges often align with different investment patterns:
lower scores (5-10 points) frequently correspond with more conservative investment preferences and emphasis on stability
middle-range scores (11-15 points) typically reflect moderate investment tendencies with balanced risk-return perspectives
higher scores (16-20 points) commonly indicate comfort with more aggressive and growth-orientated approaches and market fluctuations.
Example Portfolio Options…
Conservative Portfolio (Risk Score: 5-10)
Allocation: 30% stocks, 50% bonds, 20% cash
Best suited for:
Retirees or those near retirement
Investors who prioritize capital preservation
Those with shorter investment horizons (5-7 years)
Income-focused accounts like retirement distributions
Risk-averse investors who lose sleep over market volatility
Example: Steve, 72, recently retired and needs regular income from his portfolio. His primary goal is preserving his nest egg while generating steady returns for living expenses.
Moderate Portfolio (Risk Score: 11-15)
Allocation: 60% stocks, 30% bonds, 10% cash
Best suited for:
Mid-career professionals (40-55 years old)
Balanced growth and income seekers
Medium-term goals (8-15 years)
General investment accounts
Those comfortable with moderate market fluctuations
Example: James, 45, is saving for both retirement and his children's college education. He has time to weather market volatility but still wants some portfolio stability.
Aggressive Portfolio (Risk Score: 16-20)
Allocation: 80% stocks, 15% bonds, 5% cash
Best suited for:
Young professionals starting their investment journey
Long-term investors (15+ years horizon)
Growth-oriented retirement accounts (Roth IRA, 401k)
Those who can emotionally and financially handle market swings
High-income earners with strong risk tolerance
Example: Alex, 32, has just started his career in tech and is maximizing his retirement contributions. With 30+ years until retirement, he can pursue higher returns despite short-term market volatility.
Conclusion
Understanding investment risk tolerance involves multiple factors that can evolve over time. While risk assessment questionnaires help identify general comfort levels with different investment approaches, they represent just one aspect of the broader investment landscape. Other important considerations include economic conditions, market cycles, personal circumstances, and long-term financial objectives.
For any questions please email: j@anti-advisor.com